Search for: All records

Abstract Small-scale interplanetary magnetic flux ropes (SMFRs) are similar to ICMEs in magnetic structure, but are smaller and do not exhibit coronal mass ejection plasma signatures. We present a computationally efficient and GPU-powered version of the single-spacecraft automated SMFR detection algorithm based on the Grad–Shafranov (GS) technique. Our algorithm can process higher resolution data, eliminates selection bias caused by a fixed 〈B〉 threshold, has improved detection criteria demonstrated to have better results on an MHD simulation, and recovers full 2.5D cross sections using GS reconstruction. We used it to detect 512,152 SMFRs from 27 yr (1996–2022) of 3 s cadence Wind measurements. Our novel findings are the following: (1) the SMFR filling factor (∼ 35%) is independent of solar activity, distance to the heliospheric current sheet, and solar wind plasma type, although the minority of SMFRs with diameters greater than ∼0.01 au have a strong solar activity dependence; (2) SMFR diameters follow a log-normal distribution that peaks below the resolved range (≳10⁴km), although the filling factor is dominated by SMFRs between 10⁵and 10⁶km; (3) most SMFRs at 1 au have strong field-aligned flows like those from Parker Solar Probe measurements; (4) the radial density (generally ∼1 detected per 10⁶km) and axial magnetic flux density of SMFRs are higher in faster solar wind types, suggesting that they are more compressed. Implications for the origin of SMFRs and switchbacks are briefly discussed. The new algorithm and SMFR dataset are made freely available. 

Abstract Interplanetary magnetic flux ropes (MFRs) are commonly observed structures in the solar wind, categorized as magnetic clouds (MCs) and small-scale MFRs (SMFRs) depending on whether they are associated with coronal mass ejections. We apply machine learning to systematically compare SMFRs, MCs, and ambient solar wind plasma properties. We construct a data set of 3-minute averaged sequential data points of the solar wind’s instantaneous bulk fluid plasma properties using about 20 years of measurements from Wind. We label samples by the presence and type of MFRs containing them using a catalog based on Grad–Shafranov (GS) automated detection for SMFRs and NASA's catalog for MCs (with samples in neither labeled non-MFRs). We apply the random forest machine learning algorithm to find which categories can be more easily distinguished and by what features. MCs were distinguished from non-MFRs with an area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) of 94% and SMFRs with an AUC of 89%, and had distinctive plasma properties. In contrast, while SMFRs were distinguished from non-MFRs with an AUC of 86%, this appears to rely solely on the 〈B〉 > 5 nT threshold applied by the GS catalog. The results indicate that SMFRs have virtually the same plasma properties as the ambient solar wind, unlike the distinct plasma regimes of MCs. We interpret our findings as additional evidence that most SMFRs at 1 au are generated within the solar wind. We also suggest that they should be considered a salient feature of the solar wind’s magnetic structure rather than transient events. 

Key Points Magnetospheric Multiscale observed a series of foreshock transients near the Earth's bow shock Pc1 waves and magnetic impulse events are observed by ground magnetometers in both hemispheres following the foreshock transients The difference in observation times between hemispheres implies that Pc1 waves are generated in the off‐equatorial region